RESISTANCE OF YIELDING ROCK BOLTS TO MULTIPLE IMPACT LOADS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/Abstract
The paper presents the methodology and results of laboratory testing yielding rock bolt resistance to multiple impact loads exerted by means of a drop hammer. The methodology was based on standard ASTM D7401-08 as well as the test methodology and requirements specified for rock bolts by the Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag (LKAB - a Swedish mining company) and the Safety In Mines Research Advisory Committee of South Africa (Project Number: GAP 423). During the tests, the loading force and bolt elongation were measured with a sampling frequency of fs=19.2 kHz. In order to analyse the phenomena occurring during the studies, the tests were recorded using two independent high-speed video cameras (600 and 1000 frames per second) and one thermal camera (128 frames per second).
The tests of macro-deformed type yielding rock bolt (“Secura bolt”) resistance to multiple impact loads demonstrated that all the samples transferred double the gravitational potential energy of Ep=50.85 kJ from the impact load of mass m=2825 kg and impact velocity of v=6.0 m/s, without damage. Damage to the bolt-resin contact in the upper anchoring zone of the bolt in the steel tube occurred in subsequent impacts. As a result, the macro-deformed bolt achieves additional yield, and its functioning following the shearing of the resin bond is similar to that of a “cone bolt”. Only one test, during the fourth impact, resulted in damage to the threaded bolt rod-nut coupling; however, no damage to the bolt-resin contact zone was observed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andrzej Pytlik, Donald O'Connor, Justin Graeme Corbett

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
THE INSTITUTE, AS A BODY, IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STATEMENTS AND OPINIONS ADVANCED IN ANY OF ITS PUBLICATIONS.
Copyright© 1978 by The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. All rights reserved. Multiple copying of the contents of this publication or parts thereof without permission is in breach of copyright, but permission is hereby given for the copying of titles and abstracts of papers and names of authors. Permission to copy illustrations and short extracts from the text of individual contributions is usually given upon written application to the Institute, provided that the source (and where appropriate, the copyright) is acknowledged. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of review or criticism under The Copyright Act no. 98, 1978, Section 12, of the Republic of South Africa, a single copy of an article may be supplied by a library for the purposes of research or private study. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publishers. Multiple copying of the contents of the publication without permission is always illegal.
U.S. Copyright Law applicable to users In the U.S.A.
The appearance of the statement of copyright at the bottom of the first page of an article appearing in this journal indicates that the copyright holder consents to the making of copies of the article for personal or internal use. This consent is given on condition that the copier pays the stated fee for each copy of a paper beyond that permitted by Section 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. The fee is to be paid through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Operations Center, P.O. Box 765, Schenectady, New York 12301, U.S.A. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.